Read the city through loops
Grid streets, curved roads, parks and paths create different route shapes. Planning a loop encourages attention to how those pieces connect.
A route should suit the person and the place; territory eligibility is secondary to safety and lawful access.
Familiar areas can still be explored
Exploration does not require tourism. A different block, a longer return path or a connection between known streets can make an everyday outing less automatic.
Marchh gives an eligible route a shared-map result rather than inventing location-specific facts.
Protect privacy and place
Do not publish personal information in route titles, captions or social content. Public territory may associate a profile with a geographic area, but it should never be used to infer residence.
Avoid private property, restricted infrastructure and unsafe traffic conditions.
Plan around public connections
In a city, a safe loop may depend on crossings, opening hours, pedestrian access and construction that a basemap cannot fully communicate. Confirm the route from current real-world information and be willing to change it.
A closed shape is useful to Marchh only after the physical route has been completed lawfully and the accepted GPS data passes evaluation.
No invented city coverage
Marchh does not publish a city page here merely because a city name can be placed in a URL. A useful city page would need real public territory totals, aggregate movement, a public map visual and unique local context.
Until that privacy-reviewed data exists, unknown city URLs return 404 and stay out of the sitemap.
Questions people ask
Does every activity create territory?
No. A completed activity does not guarantee a claim. Route geometry, location quality, activity integrity, territory conflicts and other Marchh validation rules can affect eligibility.
